← Back to Track Record

Los Angeles A vs Pittsburgh

Sports Β· Kalshi Β· Called YES, verified LOSS Β· Sep 5, 2026
View the original Kalshi market →
Verified Outcome
LOSS
PillarLab called Pittsburgh to win (YES @ 67%).
Result: Pittsburgh did not win. The call was wrong. Final result: Los Angeles A won.
Analyzed: Sep 5, 2026, 10:45 PM UTC
Market resolved: Sep 6, 2026, 1:27 AM UTC
Called 3h before resolution. The call was made before the outcome was known.

https://kalshi.com/markets/kxmlbgame/los-angeles-a-vs-pittsburgh/KXMLBGAME-26SEP051840LAAPIT?utm_source=kalshiapp_eventdetails

PillarLab
πŸ“‘ Fetching Kalshi data...
PillarLab
βœ… Got data from Kalshi API!0.5s
PillarLab
πŸ” Step 1: Detecting market type and category...
PillarLab
βœ… Category: ⚽ SPORTS βœ… Type: MULTI_CANDIDATE πŸ“Š Market: Los Angeles A vs Pittsburgh πŸ“… Date: 2026-09-05T22:40:00.000Z πŸ’° Volume: $285,694 Current Odds: β€’ Pittsburgh: 67% β€’ Los Angeles A: 34%1.2s
PillarLab
⏳ Step 2: Gathering intelligence (parallel)...
PillarLab
βœ… Intelligence gathered: Sportsbook Consensus (50+ books, vig removed) Β· Injury Report Β· Team Stats Β· Candidate Dossiers (case for + case against, every candidate β‰₯2%)11.2s
PillarLab
🧠 Step 3: Deep Analysing across all 9 pillars β€” hang tight, ~20s...
PillarLab

πŸ“Š Market Summary

⚽ Los Angeles A vs Pittsburgh

Team/PlayerCurrent Odds
Pittsburgh67%
Los Angeles A34%

2 options total

PillarLab

🎯 Best Trade

  • Action: Pittsburgh β€” YES @ 67%

  • Confidence: πŸ”΄ LOW Β· Uncertainty: LOW

  • Why: 14 sharp books price Pittsburgh between 63 and 64 (DraftKings 64, FanDuel 64, BetMGM 64, Caesars (WH) 63, Bovada 64, BetOnline 63, LowVig 63, Unibet FR 63, 888sport 64, Betclic 63, GTbets 63, 1xBet 63, Winamax 63, Winamax FR 62). Consensus, vig removed: 63.4%. The market has Pittsburgh at 67%. The market is 3.6 points above the books, so you pay a little over fair. Still the right side.

Line move since our first snapshot: Pittsburgh 63.1% to 63.4%. No meaningful move.

  • Why Los Angeles A is priced where it is (34%):
  • Los Angeles A has lost 9 of their last 10 games.
  • They are 23-43 on the road.
  • Starter Ryan Johnson has a 5.47 ERA and 1.42 WHIP, which is a poor matchup against a home team in better form.

πŸ“ What would change this call: if the market drops Pittsburgh 5+ points under the books it becomes a HIGH-confidence discount. If the top books split by more than 5 points, or a starter is scratched, it goes to HOLD.

PillarLab

🏦 What the Books Say

Percent is the number the call runs on. American odds in parentheses are the same price, shown the way a sportsbook shows it.

BookPittsburghLos Angeles A
DraftKings63.5% (-198)36.5% (+162)
FanDuel63.6% (-196)36.4% (+164)
BetMGM63.9% (-200)36.1% (+165)
Caesars (WH)63% (-180)37% (+165)
Bovada63.7% (-199)36.3% (+164)
BetOnline63.4% (-185)36.6% (+167)
LowVig63.4% (-185)36.6% (+167)
Unibet FR62.5% (-213)37.5% (+145)
888sport64.3% (-213)35.7% (+165)
Betclic63% (-200)37% (+155)
GTbets63.2% (-185)36.8% (+165)
1xBet63.4% (-183)36.6% (+168)
Winamax63% (-200)37% (+155)
Winamax FR62.3% (-208)37.7% (+145)
Consensus, vig removed63.4%36.6%

14 sportsbooks priced this game. Spread across the top 14 on Pittsburgh: 1.4 pts (books agree). Best price: Pittsburgh -180 at Caesars (WH) Β· Los Angeles A +168 at 1xBet.

PillarLab

πŸ“ˆ Where the Market Stands

OptionMarketBook ConsensusGapVerdict
Pittsburgh67%63.4%+3.6 ptsβšͺ FAIR PRICE
Los Angeles A34%36.6%-2.6 ptsβšͺ FAIR PRICE

Gap is market minus book consensus. Negative means the market is cheaper than the books, that is the discount we look for. 5 or more points cheaper is where the edge lives. 5 or more points over is overpaying.

PillarLab

πŸ”¬ 9-Pillar Analysis (Sharp Trading Method)

🏦 1. Book Consensus

Consensus of 14 sportsbooks, vig removed: Pittsburgh 63.4%, Los Angeles A 36.6%. Spread across the top books on Pittsburgh: 1.4 pts (books agree).

πŸ“ˆ 2. Form & Head-to-Head

Pittsburgh has won 4 of their last 5 and are 6-4 in their last 10, while Los Angeles A has lost 9 of their last 10 and are 53-87 overall.

πŸ₯ 3. Injury Report

No specific injuries reported for either team; Konnor Griffin returned from the IL for Pittsburgh.

🧾 4. Starters & Lineups

Pitching probables: Ryan Johnson (3-7, 5.47 ERA) for Los Angeles A, Jared Jones (2-6, 4.83 ERA) for Pittsburgh.

πŸ“° 5. Recent News (48h)

Nothing material in the last 48 hours.

🌀️ 6. Situational Factors

Pittsburgh is at home (36-33 home record) while Los Angeles A is on the road (23-43 road record).

πŸ”€ 7. Line Movement

Since our first snapshot (2026-09-05 18:05 UTC): Pittsburgh 63.1% to 63.4%, Los Angeles A 37% to 36.6%. No meaningful move.

πŸ•’ 8. What the Books May Not Have Priced

LOW - No late scratches or starter changes dated after the last line move; the only news is Griffin's return, which is already priced.

⚑ 9. Why the Other Side Is Priced Where It Is

Los Angeles A sits at 34% because they have lost 9 of their last 10, are 23-43 on the road, and their starter Ryan Johnson has a 5.47 ERA, while Pittsburgh is at home and has won 4 of their last 5.

PillarLab

⚠️ Disclaimer: AI can make mistakes. This is not financial advice. Do your own research before placing any trades.

Stop guessing. See the edge.

Paste any Kalshi or Polymarket market. PillarLab runs a full 9-pillar analysis and hands you a Best Trade call in about 30 seconds.

Free to start Β· 10 credits Β· no card

PillarLab AI is an AI prediction-market analyzer that runs a 9-pillar analysis on Kalshi and Polymarket markets and publishes a public, settlement-verified track record of its decisive calls.

PillarLab AI
PillarLab
9-Pillar Analysis ~30s

#1 AI-Powered Prediction Market Analyzer Tool for Kalshi & Polymarket

Paste any market URL for a full 9-pillar analysis: Vegas lines, injury reports, weather forecasts, sentiment, edge vs market, and a Best Trade call.

How it works

Paste a Kalshi or Polymarket URL β†’ AI fetches real-time API market data β†’ 4–5 parallel intelligence sources β†’ a deep 9-pillar analysis β†’ an actionable prediction with an edge estimate. 5 market categories: Politics, Sports, Weather, Finance and General.

⚽ Sports (9 Pillars)

  1. 1.Vegas Lines β†’ spread, moneyline, totals
  2. 2.Line Movement β†’ sharp money signals
  3. 3.Injury Reports β†’ player status tracking
  4. 4.Reddit Sentiment β†’ r/sportsbook consensus
  5. 5.Team Statistics β†’ form, H2H, splits
  6. 6.Situational Factors β†’ rest, travel, schedule
  7. 7.Handle Splits β†’ public vs sharp money
  8. 8.Time Decay β†’ late line movement
  9. 9.Contrarian Check β†’ fade-the-public value

🌦️ Weather (9 Pillars)

  1. 1.Forecast Consensus β†’ GFS / ECMWF / NWS agreement
  2. 2.Ensemble Spread β†’ GEFS uncertainty range
  3. 3.Forecast Skill Decay β†’ accuracy vs time horizon
  4. 4.Historical Base Rate β†’ NOAA climate frequency
  5. 5.Model Divergence β†’ where models disagree vs market
  6. 6.Micro-Climate Bias β†’ station-specific effects
  7. 7.Storm Track β†’ NHC cone / hurricane tracking
  8. 8.Market Pricing β†’ implied probability vs forecast
  9. 9.Contrarian Check β†’ overshoot / mean-reversion

πŸ’° Finance (9 Pillars)

  1. 1.Technical Analysis β†’ RSI, MACD, support levels
  2. 2.Fundamental Metrics β†’ P/E, revenue, earnings
  3. 3.Smart Money β†’ institutional flows, insider trades
  4. 4.Reddit Sentiment β†’ WSB, r/stocks analysis
  5. 5.Macro Indicators β†’ Fed rates, inflation, GDP
  6. 6.News Catalysts β†’ earnings, product launches
  7. 7.Social Velocity β†’ Twitter momentum tracking
  8. 8.Market Signals β†’ volume, bid-ask analysis
  9. 9.Contrarian Check β†’ overcrowded trade detection

πŸ“° General (9 Pillars)

  1. 1.Base Rate β†’ historical frequency analysis
  2. 2.Official Benchmarks β†’ expert forecasts
  3. 3.Reddit Sentiment β†’ subreddit consensus
  4. 4.Social Velocity β†’ viral momentum tracking
  5. 5.News Recency β†’ 24–72h breaking news
  6. 6.Source Quality β†’ credibility scoring
  7. 7.Time Decay β†’ resolution timeline
  8. 8.Contrarian Check β†’ hidden edge detection

πŸ›οΈ Politics (9 Pillars)

  1. 1.Polls Analysis β†’ polling vs market odds divergence
  2. 2.Economic Impact β†’ GDP, unemployment affecting votes
  3. 3.Approval Ratings β†’ candidate favorability tracking
  4. 4.Cross-Platform Markets β†’ Polymarket vs Kalshi arbitrage
  5. 5.Breaking News β†’ events shifting political odds
  6. 6.Regional Patterns β†’ swing state analysis
  7. 7.Social Sentiment β†’ Reddit, X political trends
  8. 8.Data Uncertainty β†’ confidence intervals
  9. 9.Contrarian Risk β†’ devil's advocate view