Chat With Event Markets,
Not Generic AI

You know how ChatGPT gives you a nice, polished answer to basically anything? Great for emails, terrible for event contracts.

When you ask it "Should I take Polymarket's 'No' at 72%?" it gives you some surface-level take from outdated training data. No live market integration, no structured methodology, no edge detection.

PillarLab is different.

I run 1,700+ specialized analysis frameworks across prediction markets. When you paste a Polymarket or Kalshi link, I pull live odds, run 10-12 domain-specific "pillars" in parallel, cross-reference historical patterns, detect mispricings, calculate expected value, and deliver a structured verdict — all in about 30 seconds.

Not generic answers. Structured analysis with real data, edge detection, and actionable intelligence.

Highest Temperature in NYC on Mar 19, 2026?

Kalshi | $35.2K volume | 45° to 46° at 44%

Outcome	Odds
45° to 46°	44%
43° to 44°	31%
47° to 48°	17%
42° or below	6%
49° to 50°	5%
51° or above	3%

The market is pricing in a chilly March 19th with a 45% lean toward the 45°-46° range. Short-term forecasts show a weak weather system moving through with flurries and light rain, keeping a lid on any early spring warmth.

While historical averages for this date sit around 48°-50°, the immediate "cold shot" from a lingering polar vortex is suppressing the odds. The crowd is betting on the cold front, but if the rain clears by midday, the high March sun angle can easily spike temps 5 degrees above forecast in a matter of hours.

Assessment: Just 13 points between leaders. A single headline could flip this. Decent volume at $35.2K — crowd has some conviction.

Ready to go deeper? Here's what I'll analyze (11 pillars, 12 credits):

Pillar	What It Does
Base Rate Anchor	Historical March 19th high temperatures in NYC over the last 50-100 years
Precedent Outcome Distribution	Frequency distribution of daily high temps for 3rd week of March
Metric Persistence Analyzer	Persistence of warming trends in NYC spring temperatures
Implied Probability Decoder	Normalizing probabilities across 6 temperature range candidates
Calibration Curve Plotter	How often Kalshi weather markets hit the 'favored' range vs outliers
Market Efficiency Scanner	Scanning for mispricings between adjacent temperature buckets
Prediction Horizon Viability	Assessing predictive validity at current lead time
True Randomness Detector	Statistical test for randomness in daily high temperature variance
Teleconnection Influence Mapper	Correlation between ENSO/NAO indices and March 19th temp anomalies
Recovery Time Estimator	Modeling recovery scenarios based on drawdown and historical edge
Ruin Probability Calculator	Monte Carlo simulation of bankroll survival probability

🚀 Running batch analysis with 11 pillars in parallel...

Highest Temperature in NYC on Mar 19, 2026?

Analysis vs Market

Outcome	Market	AI Est.	Gap	Verdict
43° to 44°	31%	68%	+37% ↗	UNDER
45° to 46°	44%	18%	-26% ↘	OVER
42° or below	6%	8%	+2% —	FAIR

AI model estimates can change based on market news, event dynamics, or new data. These are not predictions.

↗ Undervalued · ↘ Overvalued · — Fair

---

⚠️ Risks

Context
Sudden solar clearing could spike temperatures 2-3 degrees in the final heating hour.
The market is pricing a rare 2-degree band as a near-coin-flip, ignoring historical volatility.
Calibration Curve Plotter: The actual win rate for this bucket is 37.8%, compared to the current 44% market price.
Base Rate Anchor: The temperature fell within the 45-46° range in 4 out of 31 years, a frequency of 12.9%.
Markets are efficient and reflect collective intelligence. Gaps identified here may close rapidly or reflect information we cannot capture.

---

Best Outcome (AI Estimate): 43° to 44°

AI Model View: 43° to 44° (undervalued by 37%) | Confidence: HIGH

Reasoning: Direct alignment with NWS point forecast (44°F) and current METAR observations showing a plateau at 44°F as of 1:00 PM. Historical precedent shows 71% of March days starting below 33°F with a 44°F forecast resolve in the 43-44° range.

---

💰 Edge Calculator — Expected Value per $100

Outcome	Market	AI Est.	Edge	EV/$100	Kelly %	Verdict
43° to 44°	31%	68%	+37%	✅ $119.35	53.0%	POSITIVE EV
45° to 46°	44%	18%	-26%	❌ $-59.09	—	NEGATIVE EV

---

🎯 Scenario Simulator — Your Playbook

🔴 Scenario 1: Cloud cover increases to 'Overcast' before 3:00 PM

Probability	████░░░░░░ 40%
Impact	43° to 44°: 85% (+17%)
Urgency	🔴 ACT NOW
Trigger	NWS Hourly Weather Graph showing >80% sky cover

Action	Plan
✅ Triggered	Aggressively buy 43-44° range up to 65¢; sell any remaining 45-46° positions.
❌ Not triggered	Hold 43-44° position; monitor for unexpected solar radiation spikes.
🚪 Dead when	If sky clears to <25% cover, the 45-46° range becomes a viable threat.

🔗 Reduces 45-46° probability to <5%.

🔴 Scenario 2: 1:00 PM METAR report shows 45°F

Probability	██░░░░░░░░ 15%
Impact	45° to 46°: 70% (+26%)
Urgency	🔴 ACT NOW
Trigger	KNYC METAR station update at 12:51 PM or 1:51 PM

Action	Plan
✅ Triggered	Exit 43-44° position immediately; the 'warm tail' is manifesting.
❌ Not triggered	Maintain 43-44° position; the plateau at 44°F is holding.
🚪 Dead when	If 2:00 PM reading remains 44°F, the 43-44° outcome is 90% locked.

🔗 Invalidates the 'Cold Air Retention' thesis from Pillar 11.

---

📊 Historical Pattern Match

Relevance	Pattern	Sample	Hit Rate	Source
🔴 HIGH	March days starting <33°F with NWS forecast of 44°F	42 events	71%	Precedent Outcome Distribution
🟡 MED	Kalshi weather favorite vs. NWS point forecast divergence	115 markets	64%	Market Efficiency Scanner

---

⚠️ Regression Alerts — Mean Reversion Signals

Candidate	Metric	Current	Baseline	Z-Score	Direction	Implication
45° to 46°	Implied Probability vs. Climatology	44%	12.9%	+2.4σ	📈 OVERPERFORMING	Market is pricing a rare 2-degree band as a near-coin-flip, ignoring historical volatility.

Z-Score > 2.0σ = high regression risk.

---

Pillar Analysis Summary

8 Constructive · 2 Cautious · 1 Balanced | Avg Confidence: 81%

Pillar	Signal	Key Finding
Market Efficiency & Mispricing Scanner	🟢	Kalshi's 45-46° is at 44%, while Polymarket's equivalent shows combined lower probability for the high end.
Prediction Horizon Viability	🟢	Half-life measured in hours (~4 hours to peak). 95% of predictive power from current observations.
Precedent Outcome Distribution	🟢	Wide distribution (Record High 77°F, Record Low 7°F), current year skewed toward cold tail.
True Randomness Detector	🟢	Current temp 31°F; Forecast high 44°F. Strong persistence in current air mass.
Calibration Curve Plotter	🔴	Actual win rate for this bucket is 37.8%, vs current 44% market price. Market overpricing the favorite.
Recovery Time Estimator	🟢	A 1-degree difference shifts winning outcome from favorite to runner-up. Position sizing critical.
Base Rate Anchor	🔴	Temperature fell within 45-46° in 4 of 31 years — only 12.9%. The 44% price is a significant outlier.
Metric Persistence Analyzer	🟢	0.88 correlation between 9:00 AM temp (44°F) and daily high exceeding 45°F.
Implied Probability Decoder	🟢	The 43-44° bracket has a true market-implied probability of 29.2% once vig is removed.
Teleconnection Influence Mapper	🟢	NAO index at -1.2, historically associated with below-normal temperatures in the Northeast.
Ruin Probability Calculator	🟡	Monte Carlo: 4.2% ruin probability at 5% Kelly sizing over 50 trades.

---

⚡ Watch For

• Market irrationally favoring 45-46°F (44%) despite 44°F NWS point forecast.
• Real-time KNYC observations show temperature stall at 44°F.
• Historical base rates for this 2-degree band only ~13%, making 44% price a significant outlier.
• ⚠️ Sudden solar clearing could spike temps 2-3 degrees in the final heating hour.

---

Next Events to Watch

• Mar 19, 1:00 PM: NWS Midday Update
• Mar 19, 4:00 PM: Daily Maximum Recording ⚡

---

Analysis complete: 11 pillars in 34.9s

💡 PillarLab is actively improving. If you spot inaccuracies, please submit feedback — it helps us get better!

PillarLab does not predict outcomes or provide financial advice.

Will the US Conduct a Military Strike on Iran in 2026?

Polymarket | $2.4M volume | YES at 38%

Outcome	Odds
YES	38%
NO	62%

The market is pricing in elevated risk, driven by recent IAEA reports on Iran's nuclear enrichment crossing the 60% threshold. Let me run the full pillar suite.

🚀 Running batch analysis with 11 pillars in parallel...

---

Analysis vs Market

Outcome	Market	AI Est.	Gap	Verdict
YES	38%	14%	-24% ↘	OVER
NO	62%	86%	+24% ↗	UNDER

AI model estimates can change based on market news, event dynamics, or new data. These are not predictions.

↗ Undervalued · ↘ Overvalued · — Fair

---

⚠️ Risks

Context
Iranian nuclear breakout time estimated at 1-2 weeks per IAEA — the one scenario where all constraints become secondary.
No carrier strike group redeployed to the Persian Gulf — a critical pre-strike indicator is absent.
Congressional Authorization Tracker: No new AUMF introduced. War Powers constraints and election-year dynamics create strong institutional friction.
Defense Budget Allocation: FY2026 DoD budget shifts 12% toward Indo-Pacific. CENTCOM procurement flat — inconsistent with strike preparation.
Markets are efficient and reflect collective intelligence. Gaps identified here may close rapidly or reflect information we cannot capture.

---

Best Outcome (AI Estimate): NO

AI Model View: NO (undervalued by 24%) | Confidence: HIGH

Reasoning: Despite elevated rhetoric, multiple structural constraints make a US strike unlikely. The Oman diplomatic backchannel remains active, no carrier strike group has been redeployed to 5th Fleet AOR, and DoD's 2026 budget prioritizes Indo-Pacific over CENTCOM. 7 of 8 post-1990 US-Iran escalation cycles resolved without kinetic action.

---

💰 Edge Calculator — Expected Value per $100

Outcome	Market	AI Est.	Edge	EV/$100	Kelly %	Verdict
NO	62%	86%	+24%	✅ $38.71	63.2%	POSITIVE EV
YES	38%	14%	-24%	❌ $-63.16	—	NEGATIVE EV

---

🎯 Scenario Simulator — Your Playbook

🔴 Scenario 1: IAEA reports Iran blocks inspectors from Fordow facility

Probability	███░░░░░░░ 25%
Impact	YES: 55% (+17%), NO drops to 45%
Urgency	🔴 ACT NOW
Trigger	IAEA Director General emergency statement or Board of Governors emergency session

Action	Plan
✅ Triggered	Reduce NO position by 50%. This is the defined tripwire.
❌ Not triggered	Hold NO position. Continued IAEA access means diplomacy is functioning.
🚪 Dead when	If Iran provides expanded access (Additional Protocol), YES drops below 20%.

🟡 Scenario 2: Carrier Strike Group ordered to 5th Fleet AOR

Probability	██░░░░░░░░ 12%
Impact	YES: 62% (+24%), NO drops to 38%
Urgency	🟡 WATCH
Trigger	DoD Force Posture announcement or OSINT confirmation of CSG transit through Suez

Action	Plan
✅ Triggered	Exit NO position entirely. CSG redeployment is the most reliable 30-60 day leading indicator.
❌ Not triggered	Maintain NO position with high confidence.
🚪 Dead when	If CSG is redeployed to Indo-Pacific instead, YES drops to <10%.

🟢 Scenario 3: US-Iran indirect talks resume through Oman channel

Probability	████░░░░░░ 35%
Impact	NO: 92% (+6%), YES drops to 8%
Urgency	🟢 FAVORABLE
Trigger	State Department confirmation or credible diplomatic press reports

Action	Plan
✅ Triggered	Add to NO position. Diplomatic engagement directly contradicts strike preparation.
❌ Not triggered	No change to thesis — current baseline already assumes dormant channel.
🚪 Dead when	If Oman publicly distances itself from mediation role.

---

📊 Historical Pattern Match

Relevance	Pattern	Sample	Hit Rate	Source
🔴 HIGH	Post-1990 US-Iran escalation cycles resolving without kinetic action	8 cycles	87.5% (7/8)	Historical Conflict Escalation Model
🔴 HIGH	Election-year military restraint (US presidential cycle)	12 cycles	83%	Congressional Authorization Tracker
🟡 MED	IAEA report → market spike → reversion pattern	23 events	74%	Sanctions Pressure Index

---

⚠️ Regression Alerts — Mean Reversion Signals

Candidate	Metric	Current	Baseline	Z-Score	Direction	Implication
YES	Implied Probability vs. Historical Base Rate	38%	12.5%	+2.1σ	📈 OVERPERFORMING	Market pricing 3x the historical base rate. Fear premium is elevated.

Z-Score > 2.0σ = high regression risk.

---

Pillar Analysis Summary

8 Constructive · 2 Cautious · 1 Balanced | Avg Confidence: 79%

Pillar	Signal	Key Finding
Diplomatic Signal Tracker	🟢	Oman backchannel active; no withdrawal of diplomatic staff — key pre-strike indicator absent.
Military Posture Index	🟢	No carrier strike group redeployed to 5th Fleet AOR. CENTCOM at baseline, not surge.
Historical Conflict Escalation Model	🟢	7 of 8 post-1990 cycles resolved without kinetic action. Mirrors 2019 tanker crisis.
Congressional Authorization Tracker	🟢	No new AUMF. War Powers constraints and election-year dynamics create institutional friction.
Defense Budget Allocation Analysis	🟢	FY2026 DoD budget shifts 12% toward Indo-Pacific. CENTCOM procurement flat.
Sanctions Pressure Index	🟢	Maximum pressure sanctions deployed; escalation ladder favors economic over kinetic.
Allied Coalition Readiness	🟢	UK and France have not elevated Gulf force posture. Unilateral strike politically costly.
Oil Market Stress Indicator	🟡	Brent at $82/bbl. A strike triggers $15-25/bbl spike — creating strong economic deterrent.
Intelligence Community Leak Index	🟢	No OSINT signals. Major operations generate detectable patterns 60-90 days prior.
Iranian Domestic Stability Monitor	🔴	Regime instability could trigger provocative action forcing US response — primary tail risk.
Nuclear Program Timeline Tracker	🔴	Iran's breakout time at 1-2 weeks per IAEA. Could shift the calculus dramatically.

---

⚡ Watch For

• Oman diplomatic backchannel — if it goes dark, reassess immediately.
• IAEA inspection access is the tripwire: if Iran blocks inspectors, strike probability rises.
• CSG redeployment orders — the most reliable 30-60 day leading indicator.
• ⚠️ Iranian nuclear breakout — the one scenario where all constraints become secondary.
• ⚠️ Iranian-sponsored attack on US forces in Iraq/Syria could trigger retaliatory escalation.

---

Next Events to Watch

• Apr 2026: IAEA Quarterly Iran Report ⚡
• May 2026: US-Iran Indirect Talks (Oman channel)
• Jun 2026: DoD CENTCOM Force Posture Review
• Sep 2026: UN General Assembly — potential diplomatic window

---

Analysis complete: 11 pillars in 32.4s

💡 PillarLab is actively improving. If you spot inaccuracies, please submit feedback — it helps us get better!

PillarLab does not predict outcomes or provide financial advice.

---

Two completely different pillar sets — the weather analysis used Teleconnection Mapping, ENSO Phase, Calibration Curves. This one used Diplomatic Signal Tracker, Military Posture Index, Congressional Authorization. That's 1,700+ frameworks, each category gets its own specialized toolkit.

Every new account starts with 25 free credits — no credit card required. Here's the full breakdown:

Plan	Price	Credits
Free	$0	25 credits on signup
Starter	$29/month	300 credits
Growth	$99/month	1,000 credits
Pro	$199–$1749/mo	2,000–20,000 credits

• Quick market check: ~3 credits
• Full pillar deep-dive (like the ones above): ~12 credits

Why credits vs. unlimited? Each deep analysis hits live APIs, runs real-time data feeds, and processes through 10+ specialized models in parallel. That costs real compute. Credits keep the system fast and high-quality — no corners cut.

Annual billing saves 17% on all paid plans.