← Back to Track Record

Chicago C vs Miami

Sports Β· Kalshi Β· Called YES, verified WIN Β· Sep 4, 2026
View the original Kalshi market →
Verified Outcome
WIN
PillarLab called Chicago C to win (YES @ 61%).
Result: Chicago C won. The call was correct. Final result: Chicago C won.
Analyzed: Sep 4, 2026, 10:51 PM UTC
Market resolved: Sep 5, 2026, 2:12 AM UTC
Called 3h before resolution. The call was made before the outcome was known.

https://kalshi.com/markets/kxmlbgame/chicago-c-vs-miami/KXMLBGAME-26SEP041910CHCMIA?utm_source=kalshiapp_eventdetails

PillarLab
πŸ“‘ Fetching Kalshi data...
PillarLab
βœ… Got data from Kalshi API!0.5s
PillarLab
πŸ” Step 1: Detecting market type and category...
PillarLab
βœ… Category: ⚽ SPORTS βœ… Type: MULTI_CANDIDATE πŸ“Š Market: Chicago C vs Miami πŸ“… Date: 2026-09-04T23:10:00.000Z πŸ’° Volume: $266,456 Current Odds: β€’ Chicago C: 61% β€’ Miami: 40%0.9s
PillarLab
⏳ Step 2: Gathering intelligence (parallel)...
PillarLab
βœ… Intelligence gathered: Sportsbook Consensus (50+ books, vig removed) Β· Injury Report Β· Team Stats Β· Candidate Dossiers (case for + case against, every candidate β‰₯2%)8.5s
PillarLab
🧠 Step 3: Deep Analysing across all 9 pillars β€” hang tight, ~20s...
PillarLab

πŸ“Š Market Summary

⚽ Chicago C vs Miami

Team/PlayerCurrent Odds
Chicago C61%
Miami40%

2 options total

PillarLab

🎯 Best Trade

  • Action: Chicago C β€” YES @ 61%

  • Confidence: 🟑 MEDIUM Β· Uncertainty: LOW

  • Why: 31 sharp books price Chicago C between 59 and 62 (Pinnacle 61, DraftKings 59, FanDuel 60, BetMGM 60, Caesars (WH) 61, Betfair 61, BetRivers 62, Bovada 61, BetOnline 61, LowVig 61, Marathonbet 60, Unibet FR 60, Unibet NL 62, Unibet SE 62, William Hill 59, 888sport 60, Fanatics 60, BetAnySports 61, Betclic 59, Betsson 60, BetUS 61, Coolbet 60, GTbets 61, LeoVegas 62, Matchbook 61, MyBookie 60, NordicBet 60, 1xBet 61, Tipico 59, Winamax 60, Winamax FR 59). Consensus, vig removed: 60.4%. The market has Chicago C at 61%. That is the fair price. No discount, but the side is clear.

Line move since our first snapshot: Chicago C 54.2% to 60.4%. Money moved toward Chicago C.

  • Why Miami is priced where it is (40%):
  • Miami is 4-6 in their last 10 games, including a recent 3-7 road loss.
  • Starter Janson Junk has a 1.30 WHIP, indicating he allows more baserunners.
  • Miami's overall record (71-70) trails Chicago C's (79-62), and they face a Cubs team that is 38-31 on the road.

πŸ“ What would change this call: if the market drops Chicago C 5+ points under the books it becomes a HIGH-confidence discount. If the top books split by more than 5 points, or a starter is scratched, it goes to HOLD.

PillarLab

🏦 What the Books Say

Percent is the number the call runs on. American odds in parentheses are the same price, shown the way a sportsbook shows it.

BookChicago CMiami
Pinnacle61.1% (-166)38.9% (+152)
DraftKings59% (-161)41% (+133)
FanDuel60% (-166)40% (+140)
BetMGM60.2% (-170)39.8% (+140)
Caesars (WH)61.1% (-163)38.9% (+153)
Betfair60.9% (-159)39.1% (+154)
BetRivers61.7% (-182)38.3% (+150)
Bovada61.3% (-179)38.7% (+147)
BetOnline60.5% (-163)39.5% (+147)
LowVig60.5% (-163)39.5% (+147)
Marathonbet60.4% (-175)39.6% (+140)
Unibet FR59.5% (-167)40.5% (+135)
Unibet NL61.7% (-182)38.3% (+150)
Unibet SE61.7% (-182)38.3% (+150)
William Hill58.7% (-162)41.3% (+130)
888sport60.4% (-175)39.6% (+140)
Fanatics60.2% (-170)39.8% (+140)
BetAnySports60.7% (-167)39.3% (+147)
Betclic59.2% (-169)40.8% (+131)
Betsson60% (-172)40% (+137)
BetUS60.5% (-165)39.5% (+146)
Coolbet59.8% (-169)40.2% (+137)
GTbets60.6% (-163)39.4% (+148)
LeoVegas61.7% (-182)38.3% (+150)
Matchbook60.8% (-156)39.2% (+154)
MyBookie59.6% (-163)40.4% (+138)
NordicBet60% (-172)40% (+137)
1xBet60.5% (-161)39.5% (+148)
Tipico59% (-167)41% (+130)
Winamax59.8% (-172)40.2% (+135)
Winamax FR59.3% (-172)40.7% (+130)
Consensus, vig removed60.4%39.6%

31 sportsbooks priced this game. Spread across the top 31 on Chicago C: 2.7 pts (books agree). Best price: Chicago C -156 at Matchbook Β· Miami +154 at Betfair.

PillarLab

πŸ“ˆ Where the Market Stands

OptionMarketBook ConsensusGapVerdict
Chicago C61%60.4%+0.6 ptsβšͺ FAIR PRICE
Miami40%39.6%+0.4 ptsβšͺ FAIR PRICE

Gap is market minus book consensus. Negative means the market is cheaper than the books, that is the discount we look for. 5 or more points cheaper is where the edge lives. 5 or more points over is overpaying.

PillarLab

πŸ”¬ 9-Pillar Analysis (Sharp Trading Method)

🏦 1. Book Consensus

Consensus of 31 sportsbooks, vig removed: Chicago C 60.4%, Miami 39.6%. Pinnacle: Chicago C 61.1%, Miami 38.9%. Spread across the top books on Chicago C: 2.7 pts (books agree).

πŸ“ˆ 2. Form & Head-to-Head

Chicago C went 4-6 in their last 10 games, including a 9-5 loss to Milwaukee on Sept 2 and a 2-1 win on Sept 3; Miami also went 4-6 in their last 10, with a recent 3-7 road loss.

πŸ₯ 3. Injury Report

No injury information is publicly available for either team in the provided data.

🧾 4. Starters & Lineups

Probable starters: Shota Imanaga (8-10, 4.01 ERA) for Chicago C against Janson Junk (6-8, 4.11 ERA) for Miami; no official lineup announcements were found in the intelligence.

πŸ“° 5. Recent News (48h)

Nothing material in the last 48 hours.

🌀️ 6. Situational Factors

Miami is at home, where they are 42-27; Chicago C is on the road, where they are 38-31.

πŸ”€ 7. Line Movement

Since our first snapshot (2026-09-03 22:05 UTC): Chicago C 54.2% to 60.4%, Miami 45.8% to 39.6%. Money moved toward Chicago C.

πŸ•’ 8. What the Books May Not Have Priced

LOW - No late scratches or starter changes dated after the last line move were found; the pitching matchup and recent form appear fully priced.

⚑ 9. Why the Other Side Is Priced Where It Is

Miami sits at 40% because they are 4-6 in their last 10, their starter Janson Junk has a 1.30 WHIP that suggests baserunner trouble, and they face a Chicago C team with a better overall record (79-62 vs 71-70) and a comparable starter on the mound.

PillarLab

⚠️ Disclaimer: AI can make mistakes. This is not financial advice. Do your own research before placing any trades.

Stop guessing. See the edge.

Paste any Kalshi or Polymarket market. PillarLab runs a full 9-pillar analysis and hands you a Best Trade call in about 30 seconds.

Free to start Β· 10 credits Β· no card

PillarLab AI is an AI prediction-market analyzer that runs a 9-pillar analysis on Kalshi and Polymarket markets and publishes a public, settlement-verified track record of its decisive calls.

PillarLab AI
PillarLab
9-Pillar Analysis ~30s

#1 AI-Powered Prediction Market Analyzer Tool for Kalshi & Polymarket

Paste any market URL for a full 9-pillar analysis: Vegas lines, injury reports, weather forecasts, sentiment, edge vs market, and a Best Trade call.

How it works

Paste a Kalshi or Polymarket URL β†’ AI fetches real-time API market data β†’ 4–5 parallel intelligence sources β†’ a deep 9-pillar analysis β†’ an actionable prediction with an edge estimate. 5 market categories: Politics, Sports, Weather, Finance and General.

⚽ Sports (9 Pillars)

  1. 1.Vegas Lines β†’ spread, moneyline, totals
  2. 2.Line Movement β†’ sharp money signals
  3. 3.Injury Reports β†’ player status tracking
  4. 4.Reddit Sentiment β†’ r/sportsbook consensus
  5. 5.Team Statistics β†’ form, H2H, splits
  6. 6.Situational Factors β†’ rest, travel, schedule
  7. 7.Handle Splits β†’ public vs sharp money
  8. 8.Time Decay β†’ late line movement
  9. 9.Contrarian Check β†’ fade-the-public value

🌦️ Weather (9 Pillars)

  1. 1.Forecast Consensus β†’ GFS / ECMWF / NWS agreement
  2. 2.Ensemble Spread β†’ GEFS uncertainty range
  3. 3.Forecast Skill Decay β†’ accuracy vs time horizon
  4. 4.Historical Base Rate β†’ NOAA climate frequency
  5. 5.Model Divergence β†’ where models disagree vs market
  6. 6.Micro-Climate Bias β†’ station-specific effects
  7. 7.Storm Track β†’ NHC cone / hurricane tracking
  8. 8.Market Pricing β†’ implied probability vs forecast
  9. 9.Contrarian Check β†’ overshoot / mean-reversion

πŸ’° Finance (9 Pillars)

  1. 1.Technical Analysis β†’ RSI, MACD, support levels
  2. 2.Fundamental Metrics β†’ P/E, revenue, earnings
  3. 3.Smart Money β†’ institutional flows, insider trades
  4. 4.Reddit Sentiment β†’ WSB, r/stocks analysis
  5. 5.Macro Indicators β†’ Fed rates, inflation, GDP
  6. 6.News Catalysts β†’ earnings, product launches
  7. 7.Social Velocity β†’ Twitter momentum tracking
  8. 8.Market Signals β†’ volume, bid-ask analysis
  9. 9.Contrarian Check β†’ overcrowded trade detection

πŸ“° General (9 Pillars)

  1. 1.Base Rate β†’ historical frequency analysis
  2. 2.Official Benchmarks β†’ expert forecasts
  3. 3.Reddit Sentiment β†’ subreddit consensus
  4. 4.Social Velocity β†’ viral momentum tracking
  5. 5.News Recency β†’ 24–72h breaking news
  6. 6.Source Quality β†’ credibility scoring
  7. 7.Time Decay β†’ resolution timeline
  8. 8.Contrarian Check β†’ hidden edge detection

πŸ›οΈ Politics (9 Pillars)

  1. 1.Polls Analysis β†’ polling vs market odds divergence
  2. 2.Economic Impact β†’ GDP, unemployment affecting votes
  3. 3.Approval Ratings β†’ candidate favorability tracking
  4. 4.Cross-Platform Markets β†’ Polymarket vs Kalshi arbitrage
  5. 5.Breaking News β†’ events shifting political odds
  6. 6.Regional Patterns β†’ swing state analysis
  7. 7.Social Sentiment β†’ Reddit, X political trends
  8. 8.Data Uncertainty β†’ confidence intervals
  9. 9.Contrarian Risk β†’ devil's advocate view