auto_awesome Beta — Join the First 5,000 Traders

ChatGPT Has Search.
Claude Has Tools.
They're Still Guessing.

Giving AI access to data doesn't make it think better. We built 1,750+ structured frameworks that guide AI through domain-specific analysis — not just search results.

1,750+

Analytical Frameworks

104,803+

Markets Tracked

Beta

Building Track Record

warning The Real Problem

The Problem Isn't Data Access.
It's Thinking Structure.

ChatGPT can browse the web. GPT-4 has plugins. Claude can use tools. But ask any of them to analyze an NFL spread and you'll get a wall of text with no methodology.

list

No Framework

Even with search access, AI gives you a blob of text. No structured reasoning. No repeatable methodology. Just vibes.

settings

No Specialization

The same model that writes poems also analyzes crypto? That's not an edge — that's a lottery ticket.

visibility

No Transparency

You can't see how it weighted factors. You can't verify its logic. You just have to trust it.

psychology Our Approach

Structure Beats
Raw Intelligence.

We built 1,750+ "Pillars" — structured reasoning templates that guide AI through domain-specific analysis. Think of it as the difference between asking a random person vs. giving them an expert checklist.

emoji_events

NFL Professional Flow

Sources: Action Network, VegasInsider

Line movement + market %

flag

Presidential Polls

Sources: 538, RCP, Polymarket

Poll aggregation + weighting

currency_bitcoin

Crypto Whale Flow

Sources: Glassnode, Nansen, Dune

On-chain accumulation

sports_soccer

xG Soccer Model

Sources: FBRef, Opta, Understat

Expected goals analysis

track_changes Why This Works

Why Structure Beats Raw Intelligence

visibility

Explicit Methodology

See exactly how each Pillar weighs factors before you run it. No mysteries. No black boxes.

settings

Domain Expertise Encoded

NFL, crypto, macro — each has specialized frameworks, not generic prompts that work for everything.

layers

Composable Analysis

Stack multiple Pillars for multi-angle analysis. Professional flow + line movement + injury news = complete picture.

database

Real Data Sources

Each Pillar pulls from domain-specific feeds: ESPN, CoinGecko, FBRef. Not generic web results — structured data pipelines.

bar_chart

Transparent Reasoning

Every output shows its work — sources cited, factors weighted. You can verify everything.

lightbulb

Building Reliability Scores

We're tracking which Pillars perform. When markets resolve, we learn. Building toward backtested accuracy.

compare See The Difference

Same Question. Different Approach.

Both have access to the same data. Only one has structure.

search Generic AI (with search)

"Will the Lakers cover -4.5 tonight?"

"Based on recent news and betting lines, the Lakers have shown momentum in recent games. LeBron has been performing well and the team's chemistry seems to be improving. Looking at various factors, I'd estimate approximately a 55-60% chance they cover..."

[continues for 3 more paragraphs]

• Has search access ✓
• Wall of text with no structure
• No explicit weighting of factors
• Can't see the methodology
• Different answer every time you ask
check_circle PillarLab Analysis 3 Pillars

"Will the Lakers cover -4.5 tonight?"

Professional Flow Tracker

Source: Action Network

BEARISH (38%)
Home ATS Record

Source: Covers.com

BEARISH (32%)
Line Movement

Source: Opened -6, now -4.5

CAUTION (48%)

Composite: FADE LAKERS

Professional flow against. Line moving wrong direction. Methodology visible.

✓ Explicit factor weighting
✓ Repeatable methodology
✓ Same answer every time
trending_up What We're Building

The Intelligence Layer
for Prediction Markets.

We're not training custom AI models. We're building the framework library that makes any AI model useful for prediction markets.

1,750+

Analytical Frameworks

104,803+

Markets Tracked

Beta

Building Track Record

Our Approach

  • check_circle

    Proprietary Framework Library

    1,750+ specialized analytical templates that took months to build and refine.

  • check_circle

    Resolution Tracking

    When markets resolve, we measure which frameworks were accurate. Building reliability scores over time.

  • check_circle

    API-Powered, Not Custom Models

    We use best-in-class AI APIs. Our value is the structured frameworks and domain expertise layered on top.

We're not a broker.

We're the Intelligence Layer

Think TradingView for prediction markets. The analytical infrastructure traders need.

Ready to Try
Structured Analysis?

Pick a plan and start in seconds. See the difference structured reasoning makes.

Get Started arrow_forward

Plans from $29/mo. Cancel anytime.